Usage Examples
Context Switcher
Multi-perspective analysis framework that orchestrates parallel analysis from different viewpoints (technical, business, user, risk) to explore complex decisions systematically.
Example 1: Cloud Migration Analysis
Analyze a cloud migration decision from multiple stakeholder perspectives simultaneously.// Start multi-perspective analysis
const session = await mcp.call_tool("start_context_analysis", {
topic: "Evaluate moving legacy monolith to microservices",
initial_perspectives: ["technical", "business", "user", "risk"]
});
// Broadcast question to all perspectives
const analysis = await mcp.call_tool("analyze_from_perspectives", {
session_id: session.session_id,
prompt: "What are the critical risks and failure modes?"
});
// Each perspective provides independent analysis
console.log(analysis.technical); // Architecture concerns
console.log(analysis.business); // Cost and ROI analysis
console.log(analysis.user); // User experience impact
console.log(analysis.risk); // Risk assessmentExample 2: Add Domain Expert Perspective
Create a custom perspective for specialized domain expertise.// Add HIPAA compliance perspective
await mcp.call_tool("add_perspective_tool", {
session_id: session.session_id,
name: "HIPAA Compliance Officer",
description: "Healthcare data protection and regulatory requirements"
});
// Run analysis with new perspective included
const compliance = await mcp.call_tool("analyze_from_perspectives", {
session_id: session.session_id,
prompt: "Are there HIPAA compliance gaps in this architecture?"
});Example 3: Synthesize Findings
Combine insights from all perspectives into actionable recommendations.// Synthesize across all perspectives
const synthesis = await mcp.call_tool("synthesize_perspectives", {
session_id: session.session_id
});
// Returns patterns, tensions, consensus, and recommendations
console.log(synthesis.patterns); // Recurring themes
console.log(synthesis.tensions); // Conflicting viewpoints
console.log(synthesis.consensus); // Areas of agreement
console.log(synthesis.recommendations); // Prioritized actionsDecision Matrix
Systematic multi-criteria decision analysis using weighted scoring to evaluate options against criteria objectively.
Example 1: Cloud Provider Selection
Compare cloud providers using weighted criteria for objective decision-making.// Start decision analysis
const analysis = await mcp.call_tool("start_decision_analysis", {
topic: "Select cloud provider for production deployment",
options: ["AWS", "Google Cloud", "Azure", "DigitalOcean"]
});
// Add weighted evaluation criteria
await mcp.call_tool("add_criterion", {
session_id: analysis.session_id,
name: "Cost",
description: "Annual infrastructure costs",
weight: 0.25
});
await mcp.call_tool("add_criterion", {
session_id: analysis.session_id,
name: "Performance",
description: "Latency and throughput characteristics",
weight: 0.30
});
await mcp.call_tool("add_criterion", {
session_id: analysis.session_id,
name: "Learning Curve",
description: "Team familiarity and training effort",
weight: 0.25
});Example 2: Evaluate and Rank Options
Run AI-powered evaluation to score each option against all criteria.// Run evaluation
await mcp.call_tool("evaluate_options", {
session_id: analysis.session_id
});
// Get ranked results with recommendations
const matrix = await mcp.call_tool("get_decision_matrix", {
session_id: analysis.session_id
});
// Returns ranked options with scores and confidence levels
matrix.rankings.forEach(option => {
console.log(`${option.name}: ${option.score} (confidence: ${option.confidence})`);
});Example 3: Sensitivity Analysis
Test how robust your decision is if criteria weights change.// Test decision robustness
const sensitivity = await mcp.call_tool("sensitivity_analysis", {
session_id: analysis.session_id,
criteria_variance: 0.2, // Test +/-20% weight variations
iterations: 100
});
// Understand decision stability
console.log(`Winner changes in ${sensitivity.flip_rate}% of scenarios`);
console.log(`Most sensitive criterion: ${sensitivity.most_sensitive}`);Sequential Thinking
Structured step-by-step reasoning for linear problems requiring transparent reasoning with full visibility into intermediate steps.
Example 1: Algorithm Design Thinking
Work through a complex algorithm design with visible reasoning steps.// Step 1: Define the problem
await mcp.call_tool("process_thought", {
thought: "Need O(n log n) sorting for distributed system with network constraints",
thought_number: 1,
total_thoughts: 5,
stage: "Problem Definition",
tags: ["algorithms", "distributed-systems"],
next_thought_needed: true
});
// Step 2: Research approaches
await mcp.call_tool("process_thought", {
thought: "Researching: merge sort (divide-conquer), radix (non-comparative), quicksort variants",
thought_number: 2,
total_thoughts: 5,
stage: "Research",
axioms_used: ["divide-and-conquer", "comparison-based-sorting"],
next_thought_needed: true
});Example 2: Challenge Assumptions
Document and test assumptions during reasoning.// Step 3: Analyze with explicit assumptions
await mcp.call_tool("process_thought", {
thought: "Assuming data fits in memory; network bandwidth is primary constraint",
thought_number: 3,
total_thoughts: 5,
stage: "Analysis",
assumptions_challenged: [
"Is network bandwidth actually the bottleneck?",
"Can we guarantee data locality?"
],
next_thought_needed: true
});
// Continue through synthesis and conclusion...Example 3: Generate Summary
Create a comprehensive summary of the reasoning chain.// Generate summary of entire reasoning process
const summary = await mcp.call_tool("generate_summary", {});
console.log("Reasoning chain:", summary.chain);
console.log("Key insights:", summary.insights);
console.log("Decision points:", summary.decision_points);
console.log("Final recommendation:", summary.conclusion);
// Optionally save for future reference
await mcp.call_tool("export_session", {
file_path: "/path/to/reasoning_session.json"
});Structured Reflection
Guided self-reflection that surfaces what you are missing. Iterative dialogue with insight extraction, key moment tracking, and knowledge preservation.
Example 1: Start Reflection Session
Begin a structured reflection with your AI thinking partner.// Start analytical reflection session
const session = await mcp.call_tool("start_reflection", {
topic: "Should we refactor the legacy authentication system?",
style: "analytical", // Options: conversational, analytical, supportive, challenging
use_chain_of_thought: true
});
console.log(`Response: ${session.initial_response}`);
// Probing questions surface assumptions you haven't examinedExample 2: Explore Your Thinking
Continue the dialogue with follow-up reflections.// Continue the conversation
const reflection = await mcp.call_tool("reflect", {
session_id: session.session_id,
thought: "The current system is slow but changing it might break integrations",
suggest_next_thoughts: true
});
console.log(`Response: ${reflection.response}`);
console.log(`Suggested explorations: ${reflection.suggested_thoughts}`);
// Continue as many rounds as needed...
await mcp.call_tool("reflect", {
session_id: session.session_id,
thought: "Actually, I realize the real issue is the password hashing algorithm"
});Example 3: Extract Insights and Conclude
Synthesize key realizations and create actionable next steps.// Extract insights from the conversation
const insights = await mcp.call_tool("get_insights", {
session_id: session.session_id
});
console.log("Key realizations:", insights.realizations);
console.log("Patterns noticed:", insights.patterns);
// Conclude with action items
const conclusion = await mcp.call_tool("conclude_reflection", {
session_id: session.session_id
});
console.log("Summary:", conclusion.summary);
console.log("Next steps:", conclusion.next_steps);
// Each step includes owner and suggested timeframeReady to Integrate?
All services support OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and work with Claude Desktop, Claude.ai, and any MCP-compatible client.