Usage Examples
Context Switcher
Multi-perspective analysis framework that orchestrates parallel analysis from different viewpoints (technical, business, user, risk) to explore complex decisions systematically.
Example 1: Cloud Migration Analysis
Analyze a cloud migration decision from multiple stakeholder perspectives simultaneously.// Start multi-perspective analysis
const session = await mcp.call_tool("start_context_analysis", {
topic: "Evaluate moving legacy monolith to microservices",
initial_perspectives: ["technical", "business", "user", "risk"]
});
// Broadcast question to all perspectives
const analysis = await mcp.call_tool("analyze_from_perspectives", {
session_id: session.session_id,
prompt: "What are the critical risks and failure modes?"
});
// Each perspective provides independent analysis
// Response: { technical: "Architecture concerns",
// business: "Cost and ROI analysis",
// user: "User experience impact",
// risk: "Risk assessment" }Example 2: Add Domain Expert Perspective
Create a custom perspective for specialized domain expertise.// Add HIPAA compliance perspective
await mcp.call_tool("add_perspective_tool", {
session_id: session.session_id,
name: "HIPAA Compliance Officer",
description: "Healthcare data protection and regulatory requirements"
});
// Run analysis with new perspective included
const compliance = await mcp.call_tool("analyze_from_perspectives", {
session_id: session.session_id,
prompt: "Are there HIPAA compliance gaps in this architecture?"
});Example 3: Synthesize Findings
Combine insights from all perspectives into actionable recommendations.// Synthesize across all perspectives
const synthesis = await mcp.call_tool("synthesize_perspectives", {
session_id: session.session_id
});
// Response: { patterns: "Recurring themes",
// tensions: "Conflicting viewpoints",
// consensus: "Areas of agreement",
// recommendations: "Prioritized actions" }Decision Matrix
Systematic multi-criteria decision analysis using weighted scoring to evaluate options against criteria objectively.
Example 1: Cloud Provider Selection
Compare cloud providers using weighted criteria for objective decision-making.// Start decision analysis
const analysis = await mcp.call_tool("start_decision_analysis", {
topic: "Select cloud provider for production deployment",
options: ["AWS", "Google Cloud", "Azure", "DigitalOcean"]
});
// Add weighted evaluation criteria
await mcp.call_tool("add_criterion", {
session_id: analysis.session_id,
name: "Cost",
description: "Annual infrastructure costs",
weight: 0.25
});
await mcp.call_tool("add_criterion", {
session_id: analysis.session_id,
name: "Performance",
description: "Latency and throughput characteristics",
weight: 0.30
});
await mcp.call_tool("add_criterion", {
session_id: analysis.session_id,
name: "Learning Curve",
description: "Team familiarity and training effort",
weight: 0.25
});Example 2: Evaluate and Rank Options
Run AI-powered evaluation to score each option against all criteria.// Run evaluation
await mcp.call_tool("evaluate_options", {
session_id: analysis.session_id
});
// Get ranked results with recommendations
const matrix = await mcp.call_tool("get_decision_matrix", {
session_id: analysis.session_id
});
// Process ranked results
matrix.rankings.forEach(option => {
console.log(`${option.name}: Score ${option.score} (confidence: ${option.confidence})`);
});
// Response: { rankings: [
// { name: "Provider Name", score: 0.85, confidence: "high" },
// ...
// ] }Example 3: Sensitivity Analysis
Test whether the outcome changes if criteria weights shift.// Test how weight changes affect the outcome
const sensitivity = await mcp.call_tool("sensitivity_analysis", {
session_id: analysis.session_id,
criteria_variance: 0.2, // Test +/-20% weight variations
iterations: 100
});
// Response: { flip_rate: "15%", most_sensitive: "Cost" }Sequential Thinking
Structured step-by-step reasoning for linear problems requiring transparent reasoning with full visibility into intermediate steps.
Example 1: Algorithm Design Thinking
Work through a complex algorithm design with visible reasoning steps.// Step 1: Define the problem
await mcp.call_tool("process_thought", {
thought: "Need O(n log n) sorting for distributed system with network constraints",
thought_number: 1,
total_thoughts: 5,
stage: "Problem Definition",
tags: ["algorithms", "distributed-systems"],
next_thought_needed: true
});
// Step 2: Research approaches
await mcp.call_tool("process_thought", {
thought: "Researching: merge sort (divide-conquer), radix (non-comparative), quicksort variants",
thought_number: 2,
total_thoughts: 5,
stage: "Research",
axioms_used: ["divide-and-conquer", "comparison-based-sorting"],
next_thought_needed: true
});Example 2: Challenge Assumptions
Document and test assumptions during reasoning.// Step 3: Analyze with explicit assumptions
await mcp.call_tool("process_thought", {
thought: "Assuming data fits in memory; network bandwidth is primary constraint",
thought_number: 3,
total_thoughts: 5,
stage: "Analysis",
assumptions_challenged: [
"Is network bandwidth actually the bottleneck?",
"Can we guarantee data locality?"
],
next_thought_needed: true
});
// Note: Continue with process_thought for steps 4 (synthesis) and 5 (conclusion)Example 3: Generate Summary
Create a summary of the reasoning chain.// Generate summary of entire reasoning process
const summary = await mcp.call_tool("generate_summary", {});
// Get comprehensive reasoning summary
// Response: { chain: "Full reasoning chain",
// insights: "Key insights extracted",
// decision_points: "Critical decision moments",
// conclusion: "Final recommendation" }
// Optionally save for future reference
await mcp.call_tool("export_session", {
file_path: "/path/to/reasoning_session.json"
});Structured Reflection
Guided self-reflection that surfaces what you are missing. Iterative dialogue with insight extraction, key moment tracking, and knowledge preservation.
Example 1: Start Reflection Session
Begin a structured reflection with your AI thinking partner.// Start analytical reflection session
const session = await mcp.call_tool("start_reflection", {
topic: "Should we refactor the legacy authentication system?",
style: "analytical", // Options: conversational, analytical, supportive, challenging
use_chain_of_thought: true
});
// Get initial response with probing questions
// Response: { initial_response: "Probing questions that surface assumptions you haven't examined" }Example 2: Explore Your Thinking
Continue the dialogue with follow-up reflections.// Continue the conversation
const reflection = await mcp.call_tool("reflect", {
session_id: session.session_id,
thought: "The current system is slow but changing it might break integrations",
suggest_next_thoughts: true
});
// Get AI response with suggested exploration paths
// Response: { response: "AI response to your reflection",
// suggested_thoughts: ["Exploration 1", "Exploration 2", ...] }
// Note: Additional reflect calls can be made for multi-round conversations
await mcp.call_tool("reflect", {
session_id: session.session_id,
thought: "Actually, I realize the real issue is the password hashing algorithm"
});Example 3: Extract Insights and Conclude
Synthesize key realizations and create actionable next steps.// Extract insights from the conversation
const insights = await mcp.call_tool("get_insights", {
session_id: session.session_id
});
// Get key realizations and patterns from the conversation
// Response: { realizations: "Key realizations from the conversation",
// patterns: "Patterns noticed during reflection" }
// Conclude with action items
const conclusion = await mcp.call_tool("conclude_reflection", {
session_id: session.session_id
});
// Get comprehensive session summary with action items
// Response: { summary: "Session summary",
// next_steps: [{ action: "Step 1", owner: "Owner", timeframe: "Suggested timeframe" }, ...] }Ready to Integrate?
All services support OAuth 2.1 with PKCE and work with Claude Desktop, Claude.ai, and any MCP-compatible client.